Thousands of patients getting private healthcare for free

Under "patient choice", a policy launched in 2006 to allow people to choose from a range of hospitals, patients can also have non-emergency procedures in any private hospital that can carry out the treatment for the same cost as the NHS. 

A total of 147 private hospitals are now signed up to the scheme and carrying out treatments such as knee and hip operations. While non-paying patients are not entitled to any medication or implants not available on the NHS, they benefit from better accommodation, more staff attention and other perks of private facilities. 

The number of people taking up the offer has risen from little more than 300 per month in the summer of 2007 to more than 3,600 in September. This means the NHS spent £7.6million on giving the patients treatment in private hospitals, rather than their own.

However, Jacky Davis, a senior member of the British Medical Association and the co-chair of the NHS Consultants' Association, said the policy meant the NHS was losing money overall.

She told the BBC: "This is money that is being lost from the NHS. That can compromise services and patients should be told that by going private in this way they are potentially putting care they may need in the future under pressure." 

Opponents have long argued that the policy would see private hospitals "cream off" the easiest cases, depriving NHS hospitals of their everyday work and forcing them to focus on more expensive procedures. 

However, the Government insists the policy is the best way to drive up standards in all hospitals through competition for patients.

A Department of Health spokesman told the BBC: "Choice gives providers the incentive to tailor services to the needs and preferences of patients which, in turn, will lead to better outcomes and the reduction of health inequalities."

Study may boost nutrient's use against HIV

Tuesday, December 02, 2008
By David Templeton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

It has long been known that people infected with HIV/AIDS have lower levels of selenium in their bodies, with further evidence that supplements of the micronutrient slow the virus's progression.

Now a Penn State University researcher has explained how selenium effectively battles the human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, that weakens the immune system and afflicts more than 33 million people worldwide.

K. Sandeep Prabhu, assistant professor of immunology and molecular toxicology, said his team's findings reveal for the first time how selenium succeeds in blocking replication of HIV by 10-fold or more.

The research appears this week in the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

"We hope this will be incorporated into the clinic, and this research will lead to new therapeutic interventions with selenium and selenium-dependent compounds," Dr. Prahbu said. "It could lead to a whole new line of research."

It also suggests the over-the-counter supplement could provide a cheaper way to combat HIV/AIDS in impoverished countries, especially in Africa.

"Most of the HIV population lives below the poverty line and most can't afford drugs," Dr. Prahbu said. "Selenium and selenium compounds are less expensive but still provide protection by decreasing the viral load."

The research, he said, should encourage wider usage of selenium in the United States, where health officials have been reluctant to prescribe it without understanding how it works.

Dr. Prabhu's research reveals that selenium, which the body uses to maintain normal metabolism, makes its way into selenoproteins via an amino acid known as selenocysteine.

Once a person is infected with HIV, the virus begins replicating and producing a Tat protein that causes inflammation in cells. But the body counters with the selenoprotein TR1 that upsets the chemical structure of Tat and reduces HIV's ability to replicate.

During the battle, TR1 degrades, so supplementation is necessary to restore the body's supply. It explains why people with HIV/AIDS who aren't taking selenium supplements have low levels in their system.

Dr. Prabhu's team isolated bloods cells from healthy human volunteers who did not have HIV and then infected the cells with the virus. Next they added tiny amounts of the selenium compound, sodium selenite, into the cell culture and inhibited HIV replication by at least 10-fold, which Dr. Prabhu said could be a low estimate. Once production of TR1 was reduced, HIV resumed dividing rapidly.

"Once we fully understand the function of these selenium proteins, it will give us a handle to come up with more effective drugs," Dr. Prabhu said.

Epidemiological data already suggested that people with HIV/AIDS who used selenium showed better health results.

"Now we're coming out with the mechanism of how it works," he said.
David Templeton can be reached at dtempleton@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1578.

Nurses Shine, Bankers Slump in Ethics Ratings

Annual Honesty and Ethics poll rates nurses best of 21 professions

PRINCETON, NJ -- For the seventh straight year, nurses enjoy top
public accolades in Gallup's annual Honesty and Ethics of professions
survey. Eighty-four percent of Americans call their honesty and ethical
standards either "high" or "very high."


cxtfvpxw5e


This year's results are based on a Nov. 7-9 USA Today/Gallup poll rating the honesty and ethics of workers in 21 different professions.


Nurses have topped Gallup's Honesty and Ethics ranking every year
but one since they were added to the list in 1999. The exception is
2001, when firefighters were included on the list on a one-time basis,
shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. (Firefighters earned a
record-high 90% honesty and ethics rating in that survey.)


Bankers Take a Hit


The standing of most of the professions surveyed in 2008 is similar
to that of a year ago. The only significant change is a 12
percentage-point decline in positive ratings for bankers, from 35% to
23% -- not surprising given that the banking industry is at the center
of the Wall Street meltdown currently gutting many Americans'
investment accounts and destabilizing the U.S. economy. (Earlier this
year, Gallup reported a similar decline in public confidence in banking as an institution.)


The 2008 Gallup Honesty and Ethics poll marks the first time since
1996 that the honesty and ethics of bankers has registered below 30%.
The last time bankers took a hit of similar magnitude to their image
was in 1988, when it fell from 38% to 26% during the savings and loan
crisis. However, the 23% recorded today marks a record low for the
field.


7qlqpt1yx0cumhhuxszpcq


2008 Integrity Rankings


Nurses have no peer in the Gallup rankings today, but they are
followed by pharmacists, high-school teachers, and medical doctors, all
with close to two-thirds of Americans rating them highly. Just over
half of Americans consider the honesty and ethics of clergy members and
the police high or very high.


While fewer than half of Americans consider funeral directors or
accountants to be highly ethical, these professions are much more
likely to be viewed positively than negatively.


9kk2lx8bl0e1fiilhhgg0q


Building contractors, bankers, journalists, and real estate agents
each receive relatively neutral ratings. About as many Americans think
each of these professions has low honesty and ethics as rate them
highly, while the plurality or majority consider these professions of
"average" integrity.


k6lzo_xp8eazlgik0idfrg


While bankers could be faring much worse, a year ago they were in
the top-rated category, with 35% rating their ethics high or very high
and only 15% rating them low or very low.


Indeed, several professions suffer from a heavily negative tilt in
their image ratings. The worst of these are lobbyists, telemarketers,
and car salesmen, all of which are considered to have low or very low
honesty and ethics by a majority of Americans.


Although several other professions -- congressmen, stockbrokers,
advertising practitioners, business executives, lawyers, and labor
union leaders -- are not as negatively viewed as the bottom three, the
ratings for them skew negative by more than a 2-to-1 ratio. The 12%
very high/high honesty and ethics ratings for business executives,
although not appreciably different from the 14% recorded in 2007, is a
record low for that profession. It had registered as high as 25% in
1990 and 2001.


mqw61sjkm0mlwmolyyrsca


Survey Methods


Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,010 national
adults, aged 18 and older, conducted Nov. 7-9, 2008. For results based
on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence
that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points.


Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones
(for respondents with a land-line telephone) and cellular phones (for
respondents who are cell-phone only).


In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the
findings of public opinion polls.






Blogged with the Flock Browser

OUR FACEBOOK FANPAGE